9 thoughts on “Submarine speculation”

  1. “driving” a submarine ??

    it’s curious how a naval officer and submarine “expert” would use the word “drive” to describe submarine navigation,,, ?

    anyone else find such language suspicious ? i already suspect submarines are as efficient as spaceships, and when i hear they are “driving” these vessels, it reminds me of how well the astronauts described their experience of walking on the moon,,,

    1. an naval officer using “altitude” for under water measurement ? wouldn’t that be “depth” ????

      my bullshitmeter flags red on this “expert” nuclear naval officer staying underwater for 72 days without fresh air,,,

        1. curious how much submarines plays the same narrative as spaceships and relies on fraudulent technology such as nuclear power. if we add the fake experts such as “Robert” on this show: how real are the submarines and their exploits ?

      1. an naval officer using “altitude” for under water measurement ? wouldn’t that be “depth” ????

        Yep, ship’s are using depthmeters called sonar’s.

      2. my bullshitmeter flags red on this “expert” nuclear naval officer staying underwater for 72 days without fresh air,,,

        72 days? Numerolgie involved. Besides that, the whole conversation was a very strange one.
        Have to say to that a submarine can stay underwater for a long time when it uses its “snorkel” A device developped by the Dutch.

    2. it’s curious how a naval officer and submarine “expert” would use the word “drive” to describe submarine navigation,,, ?

      Ship’s navigation is called: to steer or set on course.

  2. The entire Flat Earth SW23 show feels like a mix of No Agenda and Fakeologist Audio chat.

    Flat Earth SW23 also seems scripted: Scripted laughing, scripted inside jokes, scripted talking over each other, scripted pretending a guest has a bad connection, etc. I remember Hoi Palloi from the third Clues Forum broadcast saying something pretty profound.

    fakeologist.com/2015/09/25/cc3the-gentlepersons-guide-to-forum-spies/

    Hoi said something like this: One of the cointelpro’s purpose is to study us, not to harm us. No fakeologist ever needs to fear a cointelpro agent. Besides spreading false information, cointelpro agents also collect intelligence, on us. Why study us and collect all that info one might ask? The people working for a cointelpro study us in order to copy us. This video does a good job of copying our speaking pattern, tone and wording. I have also noticed that over time, these videos are becoming more and more fakeologist-like, sounding more and more like us every day.

    Unfortunately, their message is mixed with fake science, Judy Wood, fake in-fighting, and one other really important point: asking their audience to be brave and talk about flat earth to other people. I have noticed that this is a big theme in these flat earth videos; hosts encouraging people to take a stand and speak out.

    If someone is encouraging you to speak out to non-fakeologist about fakery in the media or the flat earth issue or anything else, you might want to rethink this advice. This advice is meant to make you look foolish in front of your peers. I guarantee your coworkers will not find your speaking out about fakery in the media a good thing. I can predict that your coworkers will think you have lost your mind if you tell them you think the earth might be flat. Bad advice.

Leave a Reply